Back in October of 2012, Apple threw the tech world for a loop by announcing the iPad 4. This was at the event where everyone was expecting the iPad mini, and the Cupertino firm made good on those rumors, but no one expected a successor to the iPad 3 so soon.
Yes,
the poor iPad 3 was less than a year old when its was pushed from the
spotlight. To add further insult to injury, Apple refers to the iPad 4
as iPad with Retina display, even though the iPad 3 was the first tablet
with the signature high-density display.
The iPad 3 is now gone
from Apple shelves and assembly lines. It's only available as a
refurbished product when buying directly from Apple. The iPad 2, however, is still sold new, and serves as Apple's budget tablet offering.
But
enough about confusing marketing practices, what are the actual
differences between the two iPads? Is it worth plunking down the extra
cash for the iPad with Retina aka iPad 4? Or should you save a little
money and grab a (gently) used iPad 3? Let us break it down so you can
decide just how broke you're going to go.
iPad 3 vs iPad 4: Screen
Both the iPad 3 and the iPad 4 come
with Apple's Retina display. They both have a pixel density of 264ppi
(pixels per inch). Not too shabby, but it's actually outdone by the
iPhone 5, which is 326ppi. We think if Apple can make a 4-inch screen
than dense, then an iPad mini 2 with Retina should be a given.
iPad 3 vs iPad 4: Camera
Apple might not have upgraded the
screen, but it did upgrade the front-facing camera. The iPad 3 came with
a 0.3MP standard definition offering, whereas the iPad 4 makes full use
of the Retina display for video chatting with a 1.2MP HD camera.
iPad 3 vs iPad 4: Processor
Gearing
up from the iPad 2, the iPad 3 comes rocking a dual core A5X processor,
with a quad core GPU. However, the iPad 4 packs Apple's latest A6X
processor, which Apple says "doubles the performance of CPU tasks."
iPad 3 vs iPad 4: Battery
The iPad 4 comes with a battery
that lasts up to 10 hours, but so does the iPad 3. Don't think that this
is a bad thing though, we noted in our iPad 3 review that despite the
high-resolution retina display, the battery life was "more than
acceptable."
iPad 3 vs iPad 4: OS
Apple's latest operating system, iOS 6,
was recently launched alongside the iPhone 5, so unsurprisingly it's
also featured on the iPad 4. The iPad 3 launched with iOS 5.1 but is
upgradable to iOS 6.
iPad 3 vs iPad 4: Connectivity
The
big difference between the two iPad generations lies within their
connectivity options. The most obvious of these is the new 8-pin
Lightning dock, first announced on the iPhone 5. Old and new, left to rightThis is 80 percent smaller and more durable than Apple's original 30-pin offering.
The
other major difference is that the iPad 4 (Wi-Fi + Cellular version)
comes LTE enabled. The iPad 3 did come enabled with 4G, however, it
couldn't be used in the U.K. But, with the introduction of the iPad 4
Brits can also enjoy super fast mobile internet when they're out and
about.
iPad 3 vs iPad 4: Price
With the announcement of the iPad 4,
you'd be forgiven for thinking that the iPad 3 would be made cheaper.
Apple has different ideas, with the plan seeming to be to phase out the
3rd gen iPad.
The iPad 4 debuted at the same price of the iPad 3,
with the Wi-Fi only tablets coming in at £399($499, AU$539) £479($599,
AU$649) and £559($699, AU$759) for 16GB, 32GB and 64GB respectively. The
Wi-Fi + Cellular versions cost a bit more, at £499($629, AU$679),
£579($729, AU$789) and £659($829, AU$899) for the three storage options.
As
mentioned, the iPad 3 is no longer in production, but Apple and other
retailers are still clearing out an inventory of refurbished models.
Savings compared to a new iPad 4 is about 15-18 percent.
For the
16GB, 32GB and 64GB Wi-Fi models, you'll spend £249($US379, AU$419)
£309($469, AU$509), and £369($549, AU$539). For the Wi-Fi + Cellular
versions it'll cost you £415.00($509, AU $499) £469 ($599, AU$589)
£539.00($679, $669).
Since there won't be anymore, stock on the
iPad 3 is limited. Honestly though, given the small price difference,
you're better off buying the newer, more future price device, unless
you're looking for a collector's item.
The paint on your wall could soon power your home by generating electricity from sunlight. Interestingly, it could even change colour on request if you find it tiring to stare at the same shade.
British scientists have found that combining the wonder material 'graphene' with other stunning
one-atom thick materials could create the next generation of solar
cells and optoelectronic devices. The breakthrough, published in the
journal Science on Friday, could lead to electric energy that runs
entire buildings by sunlight absorbed by its exposed walls.
The
energy can also be used at will to change the transparency and
reflectivity of fixtures and windows depending on environmental
conditions, such as temperature and brightness. The isolation of
grapheme led to the discovery of new family of one-atom-thick materials.
Using hair dyes may soon be a thing of the past. Scientists have for the first time reversed premature greying of hair. British and German scientists have created a new compound that reverses oxidative stress, thus curing loss of hair or skin colour.
The researchers found that people who are going grey develop massive
oxidative stress via accumulation of hydrogen peroxide in the hair
follicles, which causes hair to bleach itself from the inside out.
The research now shows that this massive accumulation of hydrogen
peroxide can be cured with a treatment developed by the researchers
described as a topical UVBactivated compound called PC-KUS (a modified
pseudocatalase).
The study also shows that the same treatment
works for the skin condition vitiligo-a disease that causes skin
depigmentation to almost 65 million people globally. Treatment options
for vitiligo are presently limited.
Current options include
phototherapy, which needs to be administered for three days every week
for three years to achieve even partial pigmentation-that too in only
30% of the patients.
"To treat vitiligo, we analyzed an
international group of 2,411 patients with vitiligo," said Karin
Schallreuter, author of the study from the Institute for Pigmentary
Disorders . Of that group, 57 or 2.4% were diagnosed with strictly
segmental vitiligo (SSV), and 76 or 3.2% were diagnosed with mixed
vitiligo.
Scientists found for the first time that patients who
have SSV within a certain nerval distribution involving skin and
eyelashes show the same oxidative stress as observed in the much more
frequent general vitiligo.
Indian-origin researchers have developed a new 'smart' robot
that can predict human actions with surprising accuracy. The robot can
refill your coffee cup and hold the door open for you, in addition to
performing several other tasks.
The robot developed at the The Personal Robotics Lab at Cornell University, has learned to foresee human action and adjust accordingly.
The robot was programmed to refill a person's cup when it was nearly
empty. But when the robot sees the human reaching for the cup, it can
anticipate the human action on its own and avoid making a mistake.
From a database of 120 3D videos of people performing common household
activities, the robot has been trained to identify human activities by
tracking the movements of the body.
Observing a new scene with
its 3D camera, the robot identifies the activities it sees, considers
what uses are possible with the objects in the scene and how those uses
fit with the activities.
In the year 2013, few things are as hyped as a new premium smartphone. There were adverts for the Sony Xperia Z
all over the national press, technology journalists (ourselves
included) are falling over themselves to pick up on any rumours about
the Samsung Galaxy S4
and even staid, businesslike BlackBerry hired Alicia Keys to be its
Creative Director. By contrast, HTC has been relatively quiet about the
new HTC One.
There was a launch press conference in London but, acrobats aside,
there were few gimmicks. Make no mistake, though; this is the big one.
HTC has fallen far behind Apple and Samsung in sales, and it hopes this
is the top-end phone to revive its fortunes.
First impressions, thankfully, are great. The One is a gorgeous
phone, and we think it wipes the floor with the Sony Xperia Z. The
combination of metal rear, bevelled metal edges and edge-to-edge screen
are class itself, and make the Xperia Z feel square and tacky, despite
its glass rear. The HTC One's curved back also makes it comfortable to
hold - a minor downside is that it's tricky to type when it’s lying flat
on a desk. The metal-backed HTC One is a thing of beauty, and even out-classes the Sony Xperia Z's glass chassis
We were also seriously impressed with the screen. It's a 4.7in model
with a Full HD 1,920x1,080 resolution, leading to a huge pixel density
figure of 468ppi. When compared side-by-side with the Xperia Z's
display, we preferred the HTC One's screen, thanks to its superb
contrast. It has incredibly deep blacks (for an LCD at least), and our
test photos showed rich, vibrant colours and plenty of shadow detail.
The Xperia Z had the advantage when it came to looking at web pages,
however; its slightly larger 5in display meant text was ever-so-slightly
larger and easier to read when web pages were fully zoomed out, helped
by brilliant white backgrounds, compared to the very slight grey tinge
on the HTC One. Last year it was 720p, now Full HD 1080p screens are becoming the norm on top-end smartphones
The HTC One wins out when it comes to web browsing performance. It
has a quad-core 1.7GHz processor, and completed our Sunspider JavaScript
benchmark in a super-fast 1,123ms. This is far faster than the 1,890ms
we saw from the Xperia Z, but we think much of this is down to the speed
of the Xperia Z's browser. For comparison, we ran the same test using
the fast Dolphin browser, and the HTC One remained ahead of the Xperia Z
with a score of 1,120ms compared to 1,357ms.
This difference was borne out in our subjective web browsing tests.
Both phones rendered graphics heavy web pages at a similar speed, but
when zoomed in and panning around a web page, the Xperia Z would stutter
when coming across a large image – a problem we didn’t have with the
HTC One.
Luckily, HTC has provided a huge 2,300mAh battery to power the fast
processor and bright screen. The handset managed 8h 32m in our
continuous video playback test, which is a strong result and bodes well
for all-day battery life.
SENSE 5.0
An Android smartphone can be beautifully designed and have an amazing
screen and top-notch chipset, but none of this will make any difference
if the software is rubbish. HTC sails closer to the wind than most on
this front, as it heavily customises Android with its latest Sense
interface.
Sense has always divided opinion, but this time HTC has really pushed
the boat out. Running on top of Android 4.1.2 is Sense 5.0, and with it
comes the end of the traditional Android homescreen, with its mix of
widgets and icons.
Instead, you get what HTC calls BlinkFeed. This consists of a rolling
grid of tiles, containing information aggregated from various news
websites and your social media feeds. You can add all the major social
media services, such as Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and Flickr, but the
choice of news websites is quite narrow; you get the Guardian, the
Independent and Reuters for news, and CNET and TechCrunch for
technology. For those used to getting their content from a wide variety
of sources the BlinkFeed selection will seem very narrow. BlinkFeed replaces the standard Android homescreen, and shows you news feeds and social networks in chronological order
It looks like the BlinkFeed needs to be specifically supported by the
corresponding news outlet or website, so it remains to be seen whether
overstretched publishers will be keen to support yet another platform.
We found BlinkFeed more useful for keeping an eye on our Twitter and
Facebook feeds, though, and often used Twitter links to find news
stories anyway.
BlinkFeed is a clever idea which is in tune with how many people
actually use their smartphones; to keep an eye on what's happening in
the world and among people they know. Of course, if you prefer to use
your Android smartphone to check your calendar widget at a glance on
your homescreen before opening your email, you will most likely hate it.
The app tray is a smooth-scrolling lovely bit of design
The standard Android homescreen isn't completely dead and gone,
though. Swiping right from the BlinkFeed takes you to a standard Android
homescreen with space for the usual apps and widgets, and you can add
up to three more screens if you need more room.
Most importantly, you can set a standard Android home screen as your
default screen (the one that appears when you unlock the handset).
BlinkFeed is still there, sitting to the left of the default screen,
while your other home screens are off to the right.
Meanwhile, pressing the icon in the middle of the shortcut bar at the
bottom of the screen takes you to the app tray, which is rather
lovingly designed; we like the way it scrolls smoothly through pages of
icons rather than continuously, as this makes it easier to keep track of
where you are.
MUSO CORNER
HTC has made a big deal about music playback ever since it first
stuck a Beats by Dr. Dre logo on one of its phones, and the One is no
exception. It has what HTC calls BoomSound – a pair of stereo speakers
at the top and bottom of the phone - or left and right when watching
video in landscape orientation.
Amazingly, these speakers sound reasonably good. It's the best sound
quality we've ever heard from a phone, but the bar is set pretty low.
The speakers are loud and produce audio with some definition, but the
sound is certainly harsh with a definite high-end emphasis, but that's
to be expected from speakers this size. We're also not convinced that
putting loud speakers in a phone is a great idea, as most bus journeys
we take are hellish enough as it is.
The One also has built-in twin microphones, which HTC says are
designed for recording gigs. We didn't have any upcoming gigs during our
time with the phone, so we decided to simulate one instead. We played
back a Crowded House gig from YouTube on our PC with our speakers turned
up high, and recorded the result on the HTC One.
ULTRAPIXELS ARE THE NEW MEGAPIXELS
As if replacing the Android homescreen wasn't radical enough, HTC has
also gone against popular convention with the One's camera. Instead of
racing to fit as many megapixels as possible on a tiny sensor, which is
normally a recipe for huge amounts of noise, HTC has made a sensor using
what it calls Ultrapixels. These are larger-than-average pixels, which
means that instead of having 12 or more megapixels on a small sensor,
the HTC One only has four megapixels.
This should mean that there's less interference as light hitting one
of the sensor's pixels scatters onto those around it, which is a key
contributor to noise in digital images. HTC also claims the camera lets
in 300% more light than a standard smartphone model; we're not sure how
the company came to that figure, but the 1/3in sensor, F2.0 lens and
optical image stabilisation all bode well. Shake-free indoor shots with little noise indoors from the HTC One - click to enlarge The Xperia Z can't manage the same level of detail, but colours are marginally more accurate
We were impressed with the HTC One's indoor shots. We saw
camera-shake free images under poor indoor lighting, with little visible
noise or noise reduction. However, we did find colours rather muted.
The Sony Xperia Z's camera captured shots with more vibrant colours, but
they didn't have the same level of detail as those from the HTC One.
The phone also picked up a large amount of detail in very dark
conditions - far more than the Xperia Z could manage. There was one
problem; a light source in our test scene caused artefacts elsewhere in
the image, which is a problem we've also seen on the iPhone 5. We suspect this is due to internal reflections in the camera's lens. Under very low light, the HTC One (top) picks up an
impressive amount of detail compared to the Sony Xperia Z (bottom).
However, artefacts are visible to the right of the monkey's ear
When we went outside, the One's camera was again impressive in some
ways and less so in others. The camera captured plenty of detail in the
medium distance, and shots were much sharper than on the Sony Xperia Z.
However, once again we found the One's colours to be rather muted, and
shots from the Xperia Z were both more vibrant and with more
true-to-life colours. The HTC One (left) produces sharper photos, but the Sony Xperia Z (right) has more accurate colours
However, when taking shots outdoors we noticed the limitations of the
HTC One's low megapixel count. Photos were fine at short and medium
distances, but detail tails off significantly in the distance, leading
to smudgy details and pixilation. Pixilation is evident in the HTC One's shots (left) when you zoom in, showing the limitations of its 4-megapixel sensor
Like all smartphone cameras, then, the HTC One's model is a
compromise. If you mainly use your phone for taking indoor shots of
friends and family, you'll definitely appreciate the impressive
low-light performance. It's also fine for outdoor snaps, but if you like
your smartphone to be a replacement for a compact camera for holiday
snaps, you're better off with choosing one with a higher-resolution
sensor such as the Sony Xperia Z, or even maybe the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S4.
VERDICT
HTC has pulled off a blinder with the HTC One. It’s a gorgeous phone
with a beautiful screen, and we think it's a more desirable handset than
the Sony Xperia Z.
Given you can move BlinkFeed out of view, the HTC should appeal to
everyone. It will be especially tempting to those who crave the
low-light capabilities of its camera. Its metal chassis is also a big
selling point - and one, based on past models, that is unlikely to
appear on the Samsung Galaxy S4.
Most will be tempted to see that handset before making a choice, but
with the HTC One, HTC has a huge contender for handset of the year. It's
an amazing phone and deservedly wins our Ultimate award.